On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, William Stearns wrote:
> I'm not sure this is correct, but:
It's correct, indeed ;)
>diff -u linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c.orig linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c
>--- linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c.orig Wed Feb 16 20:15:56 2000
>+++ linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Wed Feb 16 20:45:56 2000
>@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->queue_head);
> q->elevator = ELEVATOR_DEFAULTS;
> q->request_fn = rfn;
>- q->back_merges_fn = ll_back_merge_fn;
>+ q->back_merge_fn = ll_back_merge_fn;
> q->front_merge_fn = ll_front_merge_fn;
> q->merge_requests_fn = ll_merge_requests_fn;
> q->make_request_fn = NULL;
>
Yep. I suggest to apply these two patches on top of pre5:
ftp://ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.3/2.3.46pre5/elevator-merge-typo-1.gz
ftp://ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.3/2.3.46pre5/elevator-starvation-9.gz
(the first path is equivalente to your above patch, the second it's a
little fix for a debugging printk, that's the only difference left between
my current tree and Linus's pre5 tree)
Both patches are just in Linus's mailbox.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:17 EST