Re: why does mtrr use suser() and not capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)?

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@ocston.org)
Date: Tue Feb 15 2000 - 19:17:20 EST


On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> So I'd rather that MTRR was left alone until the house of capabilities
> is cleaned up.
>
Sorry Richard, but I was fiddling with mtrr.c for P6 ucode stuff so I
couldn't stand the temptation to cleanup the suser->capable bits. However,
if you feel strongly about it, surely Linus can ignore that part of my
patch :)

Regards,
Tigran.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:31 EST