Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :((

From: Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2000 - 10:43:48 EST

Next message: Frank de Lange: "Re: 2.3.45 compile problems: (ac97_codec.c)"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Where do YOU want to go today? (URGENT LAUGH INSIDE)!!!"
In reply to: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
Next in thread: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Sergey Kubushin wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > that it'd probably compile with kgcc-2.7.2.3 (although breaking in some
> > > other part), but it's to illustrate that NO vanilla 2.2.xx kernel is
> > > compileable outta the box...
> >
> > I don't care if it doesnt build with gcc 2.95. I keep telling people this.
> > It seems to work with 2.95 now except for a few odd driver bits.
>
> Please, do return to the ground. kgcc-2.7.2.3 is dead long ago. As well as
> libc-4.something...

Could you try resending, it looks like you forgot to attach your patch..

-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Frank de Lange: "Re: 2.3.45 compile problems: (ac97_codec.c)"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Where do YOU want to go today? (URGENT LAUGH INSIDE)!!!"
In reply to: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
Next in thread: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:27 EST