Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :((

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2000 - 10:03:23 EST


> that it'd probably compile with kgcc-2.7.2.3 (although breaking in some
> other part), but it's to illustrate that NO vanilla 2.2.xx kernel is
> compileable outta the box...

I don't care if it doesnt build with gcc 2.95. I keep telling people this.
It seems to work with 2.95 now except for a few odd driver bits.

> People !!! It's already 15th release candidate (less for all that pre's and
> ac's) and it does NOT even compile... "Use kgcc-2.7.2.3" is NOT to be taken
> as a valid excuse, it's simply broken... There have been patches addressing
> wrong assembly in 2.2.xx in l-k but nobody cared to merge them.

Most of the asm fixes have been merged after they have been checked by gcc
folks I trust. And 2.2.14 is still the first kernel that is likely to work
vaguely reliable with gcc 2.9.5. Fundamental things like FPU emulation don't
build right in earlier kernels

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:27 EST