Re: Scheduled Transfer Protocol on Linux

From: Matthew Jacob (mjacob@feral.com)
Date: Sun Feb 13 2000 - 19:38:58 EST


>
> Yes, I can see market for such beasts. Right now the de-facto
> model for "networked" disks is FiberChannel.
>
> How exactly would STP interface differ from FC ?
> E.g. how STP would be better than FC ?

Less massive protocol management.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:26 EST