Re: Scheduled Transfer Protocol on Linux

From: Paul Flinders (paul@dawa.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun Feb 13 2000 - 17:31:23 EST


Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> writes:

>
> The main reason that the drive guys are looking at stuff like this is
> margin. Drive companies are more or less giving away their products,
> the margins are very thin and the competition is very tough. What the
> drive guys would _LOVE_ is a way to add enough value that they can
> raise the cost. I suspect that when these drives come out, they'll
> be a hell of a lot more than the $300 I hope for. They'll be around
> $1000 or so. The company that comes out with them first will enjoy
> a certain amount of success and then there will be competition and the
> prices will get driven down.
>

FWIW NetGear do a box which is not a million miles away from this sort
of thing. Basically it's a 20G drive in a 8"x5"x2" box which sits on
the end of a 100Base T and speaks (IIRC) SMB and HTTP for
config. Can't remember the price and it's not _exactly_ what you
talking about but it's on the market today so I'd guess that NetGear
at least would buy your arguments.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST