Re: 'core' (patch)

From: Guest section DW (dwguest@win.tue.nl)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2000 - 10:52:11 EST


On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 10:12:33PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Guest section DW wrote:

> > So, a construction like
> > rm -f core `find stuff`
> > is meant to make sure that rm has at least one argument.
> > This is not the directory name, but a dummy filename,
> > chosen such that we don't mind if it is actually removed.
>
> Correct. And it won't remove a directory without the '-r'. So
> the original writer used the directory name to assure that it
> had an argument. In changing the name (which they are not going
> to do), I followed the same template.

No - I was the original writer, I suppose, and I can assure you
that no directory was meant. Indeed, /usr/src/linux does not
have a subdirectory core, so the directory cannot be meant.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST