Re: elevator-starvation-4 (2.2.14 && 2.3.42)

From: Alexey Zhuravlev (alexey@istu.udm.ru)
Date: Fri Feb 11 2000 - 07:01:00 EST


Hello!

I think block i/o subsystem must be redesigned ...

On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 05:44:54PM -0800, Bruce Thompson wrote:
> Sorry, but I must respectfully disagree. The time to service the
> request specifically is _not_ unbounded, it's bounded by the size of
> the disk.
>
> In general I would assert that the probability of the user process
> swamping the driver in this manner is extremely low, or else the
> relative priority between the driver and the user process is mixed
> up. I would further argue that before sending the block up to the
> user process you really ought to kick-off servicing block 11 since
> that's going to take a long time and the user process should be able
> to proceed in the mean time.
>
> Cheers,
> Bruce.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST