Re: BUG: 2.3.43 breaks vmware, 2.3.43-5 was OK

From: Brian Gerst (bgerst@quark.vpplus.com)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2000 - 21:23:05 EST

Next message: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
Previous message: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
In reply to: John Ellson: "BUG: 2.3.43 breaks vmware, 2.3.43-5 was OK"
Next in thread: Michael Harnois: "Re: BUG: 2.3.43 breaks vmware, 2.3.43-5 was OK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

John Ellson wrote:
>
> Building the vmnet module.
>
> make: Entering directory `/tmp/vmware/config/1551/vmnet-only'
> userif.c: In function `VNetUserIfReceive':
> userif.c:278: warning: implicit declaration of function `start_bh_atomic'
> userif.c:280: warning: implicit declaration of function `end_bh_atomic'
...

The kernel isn't broken. There were a few interface changes, and VMWare
will have to be fixed to work with them.

-- Brian Gerst

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
Previous message: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :(("
In reply to: John Ellson: "BUG: 2.3.43 breaks vmware, 2.3.43-5 was OK"
Next in thread: Michael Harnois: "Re: BUG: 2.3.43 breaks vmware, 2.3.43-5 was OK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST