Re: Gigabit Linux Server Bottlenecks

From: Christopher E. Brown (cbrown@denalics.net)
Date: Wed Feb 09 2000 - 00:52:00 EST


On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > If you need QoS, namely class based queing and especially class based
> > accounting on lots of ethers the choice is obvious - move to FreeBSD (where
> > these have worked for ages) or Linux. Unfortunately 802.1q is not mainstream on
> > both of them (I checked BSD last time eof last year).
> [snip]
>
> I'm *very* intrested in any performance numbers for Linux used in this
> role.
>
> Right now, if you look at big, fast, networking gear, it's *VERY*
> expensive and not very featureful. Many of them don't even support IPv6,
> much less firewalling. :)
>
> Functionally, a Linux box with a gig card, 802.1q and connected to a
> switch, makes a *VERY* inexpensive and featurful multiport router. Though,
> I have no idea how it performs. Of course it will be slower then the
> hardware based solutions.
>
> But that might be better then being stuck with expensive equipment that
> becomes a boat ancor as soon as you need IPv6 or other features.

        Ahh, but that is what an Alpha 21264 with a 64bit PCI bus/GiGE
card. High clock rates and wide buses make up for alot, and tend to
still be cheaper than a GigE switch.

---
As folks might have suspected, not much survives except roaches, 
and they don't carry large enough packets fast enough...
        --About the Internet and nuclear war.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST