On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Horst von Brand wrote:
> > > In case your application switches rapidly, it is thrashing the cache, which
> > > is crucial for performance with current CPUs. You simply don't want to do
> > > that, ever. You get best performance by _never_ switching unless forced to
> > > do so, but that isn't realistic.
> >
> > If You switch fast You have more cache reloads of probably less cache lines (
> > or pages ).
> > Since a task that run a short time has a lower probability to "touch" RAM
> > locations.
>
> On what type of application mix to you base that hypothesis?
>
> Programs which reschedule at a high rate seem usually to be those shunting large
> blocks of data around, without doing an awful lot of processing on them. They
> can touch a great deal of data in a very short time.
One way to test that hypothesis: disable the level 2 cache. Normally you
would expect a 10-20 times slowdown. If the slowdown is significantly
less, then the application is making non-optimal use of the cache.
john alvord
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST