re: Strange scheduling behavoir in SMP (kernel 2.2.14)

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Fri Jan 28 2000 - 11:38:39 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: RFC: $(ARCH) in file"
Previous message: Tim Waugh: "[patch] 2.3.41pre4: lp ioctl for controlling parport timeout"
In reply to: Mark Hahn: "re: Strange scheduling behavoir in SMP (kernel 2.2.14)"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "re: Strange scheduling behavoir in SMP (kernel 2.2.14)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Mark Hahn wrote:

>On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Peter Waltenberg wrote:
>...
>> No, it's still broken. Andrea has some patches for 2.2.
>> 2.3 is still worse SMP than UP for anything CPU intensive.
>
>where are your numbers?

Check the list.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: RFC: $(ARCH) in file"
Previous message: Tim Waugh: "[patch] 2.3.41pre4: lp ioctl for controlling parport timeout"
In reply to: Mark Hahn: "re: Strange scheduling behavoir in SMP (kernel 2.2.14)"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "re: Strange scheduling behavoir in SMP (kernel 2.2.14)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:21 EST