On 27-Jan-00 Pavel Machek wrote:
>> PGP did this by ignoring two strokes from one key in a row, so you had to
>> alternate between at least two keys.
>
> Yes, but do you think me alternating between two keys at fastest speed
> possible is giving much random data? I just timed myself, and it gives
> something like 9chars/second. Thats well around jiffie
> resolution. [ok, on pentium+ rng uses rdtsc, but no such thing is done
> for other architectures]
PGP also just busywaited on the keyboard, incrementing a counter. I think it
used about 3 bits per keystroke. Its not considered to be a very high quality
source of randomness.
> Should we put "while sitting on linux machine do NOT press
> two-key-sequence at fastest possible rate, because it could drain all
> randomness out of entropy pool"?
Eh? How can you drain entropy?
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:21 EST