almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch said:
> Horst von Brand wrote:
> > I'd say go with the proposal of the fake root/cwd directory for kernel
> > threads that don't need access to the filesystem (all of them, I
> > guess). Cleanest way out, unless you allow them to live without root/cwd.
> I agree with clean. The main problem here is to catch all threads/processes,
> including the ones not (yet) in the mainstream kernel and those which people
> haven't even written yet. I don't want something that breaks every once in a
> while in subtle ways for some silly and apparently unrelated reason.
As a (mostly) bystander, I find the idea of kernel internal threads
rooted in the filesystem somewhat strange, to be honest. That's why
I'd go for getting rid of that "feature".
-- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Viņa del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST