Re: Intel 810 Random Number Generator

From: David Whysong (dwhysong@physics.ucsb.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 25 2000 - 16:09:21 EST


On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:

>You mean -- like time in jiffies? That is 10msec resolution, do you
>recall?
>
>I think that even bad hw RNG is going to be better than that.

Yeah, 10ms isn't very good (though isn't it 1ms on Alphas?). But
add_timer_randomness() doesn't always use jiffies. I quote from the
source:

#if defined (__i386__)
        if (boot_cpu_data.x86_capability & X86_FEATURE_TSC) {
                __u32 high;
                __asm__(".byte 0x0f,0x31"
                        :"=a" (time), "=d" (high));
                num ^= high;
        } else {
                time = jiffies;
        }
#else
        time = jiffies;
#endif

Dave

David Whysong dwhysong@physics.ucsb.edu
Astrophysics graduate student University of California, Santa Barbara
My public PGP keys are on my web page - http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~dwhysong
DSS PGP Key 0x903F5BD6 : FE78 91FE 4508 106F 7C88 1706 B792 6995 903F 5BD6
D-H PGP key 0x5DAB0F91 : BC33 0F36 FCCD E72C 441F 663A 72ED 7FB7 5DAB 0F91

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:15 EST