-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 25-Jan-2000 Sujit Vaidya wrote:
> HI,
> I changed the date on the machine using the date
> command. Then the kernel compiles fine without any
> errors. But again when i reboot the system it takes
> the original date. i.e it sets the date to
> JAN ** , 1994.
> Is there any way i can change that.
BIOS considers the date invalid and sets it to manufacturing date. Unless you
can find a y2k compliant BIOS upgrade you have no standalone option.
If you are on a network set the time somewhere very early in the init scripts
to something like 1 Jan 2000 and than do a ntp date versus a machine with a
proper clock. You have to adjust the date first because ntpdate will not sync
if the difference is too big (something like 6 months or more). Than off you
go... ;-)
In btw: linux kernel release dates are very well known. Why not do something
many bioses do (as an option of course). If date on the computer is before the
release date and/or compile date adjust the date to release/compile date?
As I said as an option..., part of the RTC driver for example?
As a result linux will be one of the few systems to behave reasonably on
partially non-y2k compliant hardware (clock is OK, but BIOS or bootsrap screw
it up;-). In btw: amidst 486 this type of problem should be quite common.
- ----------------------------------
Anton R. Ivanov
IP Engineer Level3 Communications
RIPE: ARI2-RIPE E-Mail: Anton Ivanov <aivanov@eu.level3.net>
@*** White's Observations of Committee Operation ***
1) People very rarely think in groups;
they talk together, they exchange information, they
adjudicate, they make compromises. But they do not
think; they do not create.
2) A really new idea affronts current agreement.
3) A meeting cannot be productive unless certain premises
are so shared that they do not need to be discussed,
and the argument can be confined to areas of disagreement.
But while this kind of consensus makes a group more effective
in its legitimate functions, it does not make the group a
creative vehicle -- it would not be a new idea if it didn't --
and the group, impelled as it is to agree, is instinctively
hostile to that which is divisive.
- ----------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQEVAwUBOI2zaSlWAw/bM84zAQG+bQf8Dvjpz1BMYLD64swoTtiJ9Rtd0o36Uo7J
MJytT58yiaT8hC6/YjSelMxP5zPM17QolZ9BYRYh5PKv7fPC5YgRyGZgclHYQQKU
+TAl6IR6gJBogzWWDtU617e1gB5jjYGujciMwbdAVRUUW44qZakESo7ABmOxQexz
pSkQgaim0Btg1fYH7hgYFPpCoTfsl7vAJR4y/u+A6B8OZPqhaAyl/EbwhHTutm2Y
nM2kFE3HpukNpkEGloyFh1J/8VtjKI3FE9+wfSzv9XLDkZ3SLcxeBfXbySojgoGP
Sc7B3Obtf8ZrqNzlPUKBG/4dOAu64J2aLNcCu9VUyrmyV2SR5SOmzA==
=B7bM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:15 EST