Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM

From: James A Simmons (jsimmons@acsu.buffalo.edu)
Date: Mon Jan 24 2000 - 09:57:41 EST


> I strongly feel that since you are pushing for this, the benchmarks are
> something you need to do. You are perfectly qualified to do them because
> you understand your application, and I at least, apparently don't. So
> please come forward with the benchmarks and the results and until then,
> let's drop this topic. I think we've pushed it as far as we can in this
> forum. Any objections from anyone?

I agree with larry. I haven't said anything because I have so patiently
been waiting for hard results. I most interested in the the results of
wake_up. It seems to make logical sense that instead of waking up all the
process and then putting all but the best one to sleep instead wake up the
best process and keep the others sleeping would give better results. Only
benchmarks will tell.

Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"
James Simmons (o_
fbdev/gfx developer (o_ (o_ //\
http://www.linux-fbdev.org (/)_ (/)_ V_/_
http://linuxgfx.sourceforge.net

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:12 EST