> > b/w/d would make more sense in PCI nomenclature. Too late
>
> Why's it too late? Are these names specified in the PCI spec, or just the
> Linux code?
In Linux. The b/w/d is the PCI specification "byte word doubleword" sequence
> We could add {write,read}{8,16,32,64} routines now, #define the old
> read[bwl] accordingly, and in early 2.5 start to warn about the use of the old
> versions.
How about fixing the 2.3.x bugs and getting 2.4 out before that ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:12 EST